The Avid Outdoorsman on MSN
Protective orders and gun possession: CT Supreme Court just widened what counts
The Connecticut Supreme Court has just redrawn the line that separates your right to own a gun from the... The post ...
The more I delve into statutory interpretation, the more I am confronted from a legislative drafting perspective whether ...
The New Republic on MSNOpinion
How the Supreme Court’s Judicial Sanewashing Wrecked the Legal System
The shadow docket is by no means the only evidence of the Roberts Court’s systemic sanewashing. Stare decisis —a guiding ...
On December 23rd the Supreme Court performed the Christmas equivalent, dealing President Donald Trump a rare and ...
This post is co-authored with Professor Seth Barrett Tillman.] The Supreme Court's decision in Trump v. Illinois (2025) was ...
Clear Statements is a recurring series by Abbe R. Gluck on civil litigation and the modern regulatory and statutory state. Depending on who you ask, the real “bad old days” at the Supreme Court were ...
AbstractConstitutional and statutory torts in India emerged as responses to the inadequacy of traditional private law ...
Final regulations prohibiting a federal charitable deduction for contributions to a state or local fund for which the donor receives a state or local tax credit are upheld under a Loper Bright ...
Since the supreme court decision, organisations have faced lobbying and legal threats. But trans people are protected by discrimination law too When the chief executive of the Women’s Institute said ...
A recent U.S. Supreme Court decision involving the federal use of National Guard troops highlights how academic legal analysis can play a decisive role at the n ...
The Supreme Court’s approach is precisely what Congress had in mind in 1878 in prohibiting the use of the military for ...
Some results have been hidden because they may be inaccessible to you
Show inaccessible results